In my recent article “Unpacking automaticity: Scaffolded texts and comprehension,” I introduced Critical Word Zones as the foundation for scaffolded texts. When discussing this approach, educators often ask if scaffolded texts are a return to Dick-and-Jane-style controlled vocabulary. The answer to this question is an unequivocal no. The scaffolded texts built around critical word zones show how advances in language research and data analysis have transformed texts that support reading automaticity.
Unlike the strict vocabulary limits of the past, scaffolded texts use language research to create rich learning opportunities. At their core is the organization of words into morphological families – groups that share the same root (e.g., celebrate, celebrating, celebrations). This structure comes from analyzing large collections of texts to identify the word families that occur most often at different grade levels. At each grade level, words are organized by spelling patterns and word structures, creating a clear progression in reading skills.
Rather than limiting vocabulary, scaffolded texts include less frequent words when they fit the topic as well as the word learning goals. For example, a set of texts on creatures of the savanna includes words such as tapir, rhinoceros, and cheetah. These words are repeated across topically related texts, building orthographic knowledge (in this case, open vowel in first syllable), vocabulary, and content knowledge simultaneously.
The multi-dimensional approach that underlies scaffolded texts – addressing morphological patterns, orthographic features, and semantic relationships – produces texts that are both accessible and intellectually stimulating. The result is a scientifically-grounded framework that supports reading development while maintaining natural, engaging language.
Article
